The following is the edited output for the test: From the output we learn that:
Are you sure you want to delete this answer? Yes Sorry, something has gone wrong. I'm not sure about whether or not a proportion of tax money goes towards animal testing - as your first answerer said, it probably varies from country to country.
However, I do know that certain charities fund animal testing - for example, cancer charities will give money to try and find cures or treatments for cancer, which involves giving animals cancer, and testing the new drugs on them.
Many people who give money to these sorts of charities do not realize they are funding animal testing. Testing drugs and cosmetics on animals is not only cruel and immoral, it is unreliable and unscientific - animals react differently to humans to many substances, rendering many tests pointless.
For example, a contraceptive called Tamoxifen was once developed which was tested on rats. It worked as intended, and was given to humans.
However, it had the opposite effect on women, actually increasing their fertility! There are many other examples, some of which had much more harmful consequences. I don't know if you remember it, but a couple of years ago a drug called TGN was tested on some human volunteers, and very nearly killed them - they were on life support for some time, and were left with permanent health problems.
Prior to being given to these people, this drug had already been tested on monkeys at a dose times stronger than that which was given to the humans, without causing the monkeys any ill effects.
Aspirin, helpful to humans, causes birth defects in cats. Penicillin kills guinea pigs. The list goes on. I realize that some people feel that animal testing is necessary and that the end justifies the means - these people are entitled to their opinion, but I do not share it, personally.
I don't think a human's life should be considered more important than a dog's or a rat's or a monkey's - animals have just as much right to live as we do, and the right to live that life free of pain and misery. As noted philosopher Jeremy Bentham put it, the central question is not "Can they reason?
Our greater intelligence gives us a responsibility to protect other species, not the right to use and abuse them for our own ends.
A lifetime of studying, working with and keeping animals.Arkansas’ testing regime was only slightly more active, but a lot more costly. Some 3, of the 19, applicants for TANF in were screened for drug use via a two-question leslutinsduphoenix.com who.
The rationale behind most testing programmes is the belief that they will promote safety of both co-workers and the general public. 5, 22, 23 Testing is also thought to deter drug use, to help identify employees at risk for drug problems, and to enable them to seek assistance.
Through minimising the absenteeism and turnover associated with drug. We have now seen two cases that should lead us to question how field drug testing is performed.
In one case, an innocent man was incarcerated before an insistent defense attorney led the sheriff’s department to re-conduct tests and clear the man. Oct 08, · Best Answer: I'm not sure about whether or not a proportion of tax money goes towards animal testing - as your first answerer said, it probably varies from country to country.
However, I do know that certain charities fund animal testing - for example, cancer charities will give money to try and find cures or treatments for cancer, which involves giving animals cancer, and testing the new Status: Resolved.
A: The answer depends on whether the drug test is given pre-employment, post-offer, or to an employee. While the Federal anti-discrimination laws permit drug testing at all of these.
for answers and solutions to this country's drug problems. If society does not find a way to relevant data about drug testing in an accessible question and answer format. Question: Should drug testing be legislatively dictated or is a judicial order.